Taget på huset or husets tag

References

Corpus Sources

1. ↵
   1. Bludnikow, Bent

   . 2018. “Magtfuld Gyldendal-direktør renvaskes for nazisme.” Berlingske.dk, May 29. https://www.berlingske.dk/content/item/383515.
2. ↵
   1. Busch-Steenberg, Johan

   . 2018. “Det totalitæres fortryllelse—1968 var en europæisk tragedie.” Berlingske.dk, May 12. https://www.berlingske.dk/content/item/163059.
3. ↵
   1. Christensen, Bo Karl

   . 2015. “Melatonins effekt på kræft »næsten for god til at være sand«.” Videnskab.dk, May 18. https://videnskab.dk/krop-sundhed/melatonins-effekt-pa-kraeft-naesten-god-til-vaere-sand.
4. ↵
   1. Colding-Jørgensen, Anders

   . 2019. “Er du fattig, lander dine børn i klikproletariatet.” Virkeligheden.dk, September 3. https://virkeligheden.dk/2019/er-du-fattig-lander-dine-boern-i-klikproletariatet/.
5. ↵
   1. Henriksen, Hans-Peter

   . 2019. Dyret skal dø. Antwerp: Saxo. Chapters 1–7.
6. ↵
   1. Johansen, Jørgen

   . 2018. “Knud Sørensen leverer smukke og horisontudvidende digte fra hverdagslivet i den høje alders eksistentielle udkantområde.” Berlingske.dk, June 10. https://www.berlingske.dk/content/item/382610.
7. ↵
   1. Justesen, Rikke

   . 2018. I små stykker. Antwerp: Saxo.
8. ↵
   1. Ladegaard, Michael

   . 2019. “Marsvins akustiske verdensbillede er tilsyneladende større, end vi troede.” Videnskab.dk, December 8. https://videnskab.dk/naturvidenskab/marsvins-akustiske-verdensbillede-er-tilsyneladende-stoerre-end-vi-troede.
9. ↵
   1. Miles, James Kristoffer

   . 2018. “Bliver naboer til giga-byggeplads i 10 år: Politikerne har holdt os fuldstændigt i mørket.” Ekstra Bladet, July 17. https://ekstrabladet.dk/nyheder/politik/bliver-naboer-til-giga-byggeplads-i-10-aar-politikerne-har-holdt-os-fuldstaendigt-i-moerket/7230726.
10. ↵
    1. Østergaard, Jens

    2013. Line. Vinder af krimidysten. Antwerp: Saxo.
11. ↵
    1. Rasmussen, Ronnie

    . 2013. Baghaven. Copenhagen: Telling Books.
12. ↵
    1. Rosenstand, Kim

    . 2017. Den bagerste mand. Antwerp: Saxo.
13. ↵
    1. Rosentoft, Cille

    . 2018. “En uge efter.” Therosentofts.dk, July 17. http://therosentofts.dk/en-uge-efter/.
14. ↵
    1. Selsing, Rune Toftegaard

    . 2019. “Borgerlig kulturpolitik har været ynkelig i 100 år - det er tid til at glemme armslængden og få snavsede fingre.” Jyllands Posten, October 28. https://jyllands-posten.dk/opinion/blogs/runeselsing/ECE11717439/borgerlig-kulturpolitik-har-vaeret-ynkelig-i-100-aar-det-er-tid-til-at-glemme-armslaengden-og-faa-snavsede-fingre//.
15. ↵
    1. Siersbæk, Erik

    . 2019. “Grønland kan dræne den danske statskasse.” Jyllands-Posten, August 27. https://jyllands-posten.dk/opinion/breve/ECE11568956/groenland-kan-draene-den-danske-statskasse/.
16. ↵
    1. Thomsen, Thorstein

    . 2018. Den trofaste. De to ansigter, episode 1. Copenhagen: Rosinante.
17. ↵
    “Travlhed i nordsjællandske havne: Rekordmange lystsejlere får bøde.” 2018. Berlingske.dk, July 17. https://www.berlingske.dk/content/item/380455.
18. ↵
    “Voldsbølgen fortsætter i Małmø: Endnu en ung mand dræbt af skud - fire mænd eftersøges.” 2018. Berlingske.dk, July 17. https://www.berlingske.dk/content/item/17167.

Works Cited

1. ↵
   1. Altenberg, Bengt

   . 1982. The Genitive v. the Of-Construction: A Study of Syntactic Variation in 17th Century English. Lund: LiberLäromedel/Gleerup.
2. ↵
   1. Biber, Douglas, Stig Johansson, Geoffrey Leech, Susan Conrad, and Edward Finegan

   . 1999. Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written English. Harlow, UK: Longman.
3. ↵
   1. Börjars, Kersti

   . 2003. “Morphological Status and (De)Grammaticalisation: The Swedish Possessive.” Nordic Journal of Linguistics 26 (2): 133–163. doi:10.1017/S0332586503001069.

   OpenUrl
4. ↵
   1. Chafe, Wallace

   . 1976. “Givenness, Contrastiveness, Definiteness, Subjects and Topics.” In Subject and Topic, edited by Charles N. Li, 25–55. New York: Academic Press.
5. ↵
   1. Fraurud, Kari

   . 1990. “Definiteness and Processing of Noun Phrases in Natural Discourse.” Journal of Semantics 7: 395–433. doi:10.1093/jos/7.4.395.

   OpenUrlCrossRef
6. ↵
   1. Halliday, M. A. K

   . 1970. “Language Structure and Language Function.” In New Horizons in Linguistics, edited by John Lyons, 140–184. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin Books.
7. ↵
   1. Hammarberg, Björn, and Maria Koptjevskaja-Tamm

   . 2003. “Adnominal Possession: Combining Typological and Second Language Perspectives.” In Typology and Second Language Acquisition, edited by Anna G. Ramat, 125–179. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. doi:10.1515/9783110891249.125.
8. ↵
   1. Hansen, Aage

   . 1967. Moderne Dansk. 2. Sprogbeskrivelse. Copenhagen: Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab, Grafisk.
9. ↵
   1. Hansen, Erik

   , and Lars Heltoft. 2011. Grammatik over det Danske Sprog, vol. 1. Copenhagen: Det Danske Sprog- og litteraturselskab, Syddansk Universitetsforlag.
10. ↵
    1. Hawkins, John

    . 1978. Definiteness and Indefiniteness: A Study in Reference and Grammaticality Prediction. London: Croom Helm.
11. ↵
    1. Heltoft, Lars

    . 2010. “Paradigmatic Structure and Reanalysis: From NPs to DPs in Scandinavian.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia: International Journal of Linguistics 42: (1) 11–25. doi:10.1080/03740463.2010.486912.

    OpenUrl
12. ↵
    1. Herslund, Michael

    . 2001. “The Danish -s Genitive: From Affix to Clitic.” Acta Linguistica Hafniensia 33 (1): 7–18. doi:10.1080/03740463.2001.10412193.

    OpenUrl
13. ↵
    1. Hinrichs, Lars, and Benedikt Szmrecsanyi

    . 2007. “Recent changes in the Function and Frequency of Standard English Genitive Constructions: A Multivariate Analysis of Tagged Corpora.” English Language and Linguistics 11 (3): 437–474. doi:10.1017/S1360674307002341.

    OpenUrl
14. ↵
    1. Jucker, Andreas

    . 1993. “The Genitive Versus the Of-Construction in Newspaper Language.” In The Noun Phrase in English: Its Structure and Variability, edited by Andreas Jucker, 121–136. Heidelberg: Carl Winter.
15. ↵
    1. Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria

    . 2002. “Adnominal Possession in the European Languages: Form and Function.” STUF - Language Typology and Universals 55 (2): 141–172. doi:10.1524/stuf.2002.55.2.141.

    OpenUrl
16. ↵
    1. Kreyer, Rolf

    . 2003. “Genitive and Of-Construction in Modern Written English: Processability and Human Involvement.” International Journal of Corpus Linguistics 8: (2) 169–207. doi:10.1075/ijcl.8.2.02kre.

    OpenUrl
17. ↵
    1. Langacker, Ronald

    . 1995. “Possession and Possessive Constructions.” In Language and the Cognitive Construal of the World, edited by John R. Taylor and Robert E. MacLaury, 51–80. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
18. ↵
    1. Levshina, Natalia

    . 2015. How to Do Linguistics with R: Data Exploration and Statistical Analysis. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
19. ↵
    1. Lødrup, Helge

    . 2009. “External and Internal Possessors with Body Part Nouns: The Case of Norwegian.” SKY Journal of Linguistics 22: 221–250.

    OpenUrl
20. ↵
    1. Lødrup, Helge

    . 2011. “Norwegian Possessive Pronouns: Phrases, Words or Suffixes?” In Proceedings of the LFG11 Conference, edited by Miriam Butt and Tracy Holloway King, 339–359. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
21. ↵
    1. Lødrup, Helge

    . 2012. “Forholdet mellom prenominale og postnominale possessive uttrykk.” In Grammatikk, bruk og norm, edited by Hans-Olav Enger, Jan Terje Faarlund, and Kjell Ivar Vannebo, 189–203. Oslo: Novus.
22. ↵
    1. Lyons, Christopher

    . 1999. Definiteness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
23. ↵
    1. Norde, Muriel

    . 1997. “The History of the Genitive in Swedish: A Case Study in Degrammaticalization.” PhD diss., University of Amsterdam.
24. 1. Norde, Muriel

    . 2011. “Degrammaticalization.” In The Oxford Handbook of Grammaticalization, edited by Bernd Heine and Heiko Narrog, 475–487. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199586783.013.0038.
25. ↵
    1. Perridon, Harry

    . 2013. “The Emergence of the s-Genitive in Danish.” Language Sciences 36: 134–146. doi:10.1016/j.langsci.2012.04.004.

    OpenUrl
26. ↵
    1. Piotrowska, Alicja

    . 2020. “Possessive Expressions in Old Swedish and Present-Day Swedish—A Comparative Analysis.” In Exploring Variation in Linguistic Patterns, edited by Karolina Drabikowska and Anna Prazmowska, 113–131. Lublin: Wydawnictwo KUL.
27. ↵
    1. Piotrowska, Alicja

    . 2021a. “Animacy and Other Determinants of Genitive Variation in Swedish: S-Genitive vs. Prepositional Construction.” Lege Artis. Language Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow 6 (1): 109–157.

    OpenUrl
28. ↵
    1. Piotrowska, Alicja

    . 2021b. “Possessive Expressions in Danish and Swedish in a Diachronic and Synchronic Perspective.” PhD diss., Adam Mickiewicz University. https://repozytorium.amu.edu.pl/handle/10593/26478?locale=en.
29. ↵
    1. Piotrowska, Alicja

    . 2024. Variation in Nominal Possessive Expressions. Case Studies from Danish and Swedish. Leiden: Brill. doi:10.1163/9789004682184.
30. ↵
    1. Rosenbach, Anette

    . 2002. Genitive Variation in English: Conceptual Factors in Synchronic and Diachronic Studies. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
31. ↵
    1. Rosenbach, Anette

    . 2003. “Aspects of Iconicity and Economy in the Choice between the s-Genitive and the of-Genitive in English.” In Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English, edited by Günter Rohdenburg and Britta Mondorf, 379–413. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton. doi:10.1515/9783110900019.379.
32. ↵
    1. Rosenbach, Anette

    . 2005. “Animacy versus Weight as Determinants of Grammatical Variation in English.” Language 81 (3): 613–644. doi:10.1353/lan.2005.0149.

    OpenUrl
33. ↵
    1. Rosenbach, Anette

    . 2008. “Animacy and Grammatical Variation—Findings from English Genitive Variation.” Lingua 118 (2): 151–171. doi:10.1016/j.lingua.2007.02.002.

    OpenUrl
34. ↵
    1. Rosenbach, Anette

    . 2017. “Constraints in Contact: Animacy in English and Afrikaans Genitive Variation—A Cross-Linguistic Perspective.” Glossa: A Journal of General Linguistics 2 (1): 72. doi:10.5334/gjgl.292.

    OpenUrl
35. ↵
    1. Schuster, Susanne

    . 2019. “A Diachronic Perspective on Alienability Splits in Icelandic Attributive Possession.” In Possession in Languages of Europe and North and Central Asia, edited by Lars Johanson, Lidia F. Mazzitelli, and Irina Nevskaya, 267–289. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. doi:10.1075/slcs.206.13sch.
36. ↵
    1. Schwarz-Friesel, Monika

    . 2007. “Indirect Anaphora in Text: A Cognitive Account.” In Anaphors in Text: Cognitive, Formal and Applied Approaches to Anaphoric Reference, edited by Monika Schwarz-Friesel, Manfred Consten, and Mareile Knees, 3–20. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
37. ↵
    1. Siewierska, Anna

    . 1991. Functional Grammar. London: Routledge.
38. ↵
    1. Skrzypek, Dominika, Alicja Piotrowska, and Rafal Jaworski

    . 2021. The Diachrony of Definiteness in North Germanic. Leiden: Brill.
39. ↵
    1. Sørensen, Finn

    . 2001. “Possession Spaces in Danish.” In Dimensions of Possession, edited by Irene Baron, Michael Herslund, and Finn Sørensen, 57–66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
40. ↵
    1. Stolz, Thomas, Sonja Kettler, Cornelia Stroh, and Aina Urdze

    . 2008. Split Possession: An Areal-Linguistic Study of the Alienability Correlation and Related Phenomena in the Languages of Europe. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
41. ↵
    1. Taylor, John R

    . 1996. Possessives in English: An Exploration in Cognitive Grammar. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
42. ↵
    1. Togeby, Ole

    . 2001. “The Concept of Possession in Danish Grammar.” In Dimensions of Possession, edited by Irene Baron, Michael Herslund, and Finn Sørensen, 41–56. Amsterdam: John Benjaminsy.